In a designated floodplain, local ordinance generally prohibits improving or repairing a structure by more than fifty percent of its market value unless the entire structure is brought into current floodplain compliance — which usually means elevation, and usually means a great deal of money.
The determination turns on the market value of the structure alone, excluding the land. This is where most appraisers go wrong. A conventional appraisal reports a combined land-and-improvements value, and using that figure inflates the denominator and produces the wrong answer.
Because the structure-only value sets the ceiling on permitted work, the number has direct financial consequence for the owner. A defensible, correctly framed determination can be the difference between a permitted repair and a required elevation.
Local floodplain administrators review these closely and reject reports that get the framing wrong. The report must state clearly that it is a structure-only market value determination prepared for substantial improvement or substantial damage purposes.
Written by
Jeremy C. Johnson — President / Valuation Specialist. AQB Certified USPAP Instructor, Certified Residential Real Estate Appraiser, 21+ years and 7,000+ valuation assignments. Statement of capability →
Related reading
Have a question this didn't answer?
Call and ask. No obligation, and no one is going to put you in a funnel.
What the work actually looks like
Real assignments, client details removed — what each engagement actually turned on, rather than how it felt.
A house, a workshop of machine tools, a forty-year firearms collection and a stake in the family company — four disciplines that three appraisers had only partly covered. One engagement, one effective date, one set of assumptions.
A donation the regulations would have aggregated past the appraisal threshold, which the donor had assessed item by item. One qualified appraisal covering the group, itemized, signed inside the window the regulations allow.
An opposing report whose number was not obviously wrong — which is what made it dangerous. It failed on its own certification, and was answered section by section with an independent valuation to the correct definition of value.